6 Ways a Medical Malpractice Expert Witness Can Help in a Lawsuit

When you have experienced a medical problem as a result of a doctor’s negligence or improper care, it’s important to sue. A medical malpractice expert witness can help in many ways.

1. Testimony

An expert will be able to explain what has happened. Their testimony will make it easier for the judge and jury to understand what the medical problem is and how it could have been prevented if the doctor was paying closer attention to what was going on. Whether you were misdiagnosed, a doctor was negligent, or there is another problem, the medical expert should be able to provide sufficient testimony.

2. Explanations

There may be a lot of medical terms that the average person cannot understand. Your medical expert will be there in order to provide better explanations as to what was going on. They can break the terminology down so that there are fewer questions from the judge and jury.

3. Models

Many medical malpractice expert witness will bring along models. These could be physical or video models that help to explain more about what happened. People respond to visual aids because it allows them to understand more about a procedure. They can use the models to explain the anatomy and make comparisons to what happened versus what should have happened.

4. Questions Answered

There may be a lot of questions being asked by the jury, the judge, or the other party. Your lawyer is not generally equipped to be able to answer such questions because they are not a doctor. The expert witness will be able to answer all of the questions to be able to move the case along.

5. Greater Insight

A significant amount of insight can be provided by the witness. They may be able to shed some light on what happened and explain why you were affected by what the doctor did or didn’t do. What the witness says could be just what you need to build your case to be stronger.

6. Backup

The expert witness is also going to be there for backup. There’s no way to predict all that’s going to happen inside of a courtroom. Someone may ask a question or present new evidence that you weren’t aware of. The witness will be able to provide the needed backup to address questions or concerns as they come up.

Your medical malpractice lawsuit should include an expert witness so you have a better chance of winning.

6 Medical Malpractice Terms You Need to Know

Medical malpractice cases are the most complex and lengthy legal cases. The following terms will give you a better understanding of what these cases contain. Some terms that you need to know include medical malpractice, medical malpractice expert witness, standard of care, Certificate of Merit, medical errors, negligence, and discovery.

1. Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice can be defined as any liability that results from a healthcare provider giving medical services to a patient. Although negligence is the main liability in medical malpractice cases, there are other actions that warrant medical malpractice. These include breach of contract, intentional misconduct, giving out a patient’s confidential information, defamation, lack of or inappropriate informed consent and inability to see foreseeable injuries. A viable medical malpractice claim should contain the following main elements: duty, causation, breach, and damages.

2. Medical Malpractice Expert Witness

A medical malpractice expert witness is tasked with establishing standards of care and determining whether there was negligence in the case as relates to the standard of care. The complexity of medical terms is one reason why a medical expert is needed as a witness. They are able to explain the different medical terms and processes to the judge and jury.

3. Standard of Care

A standard of care forms the basis of an entire medical malpractice case because it is the appropriate degree of healthcare that a reasonable person in the medical field would provide to a patient under the same circumstances in a case. The quality of service provided is compared to the reasonable standard of care. If the provider’s services are not within the reasonable standards of care, then they are charged with negligence.

4. Certificate of Merit

Before your lawyer can file a lawsuit and for it to be accepted by a judge, there has to be a Certificate of Merit. This is a document that confirms that the lawyer consulted with a medical expert on the details of the case and found that negligence is evident. A lawyer’s testimony alone, no matter how much investigation they have done into your legal records, cannot determine that a case of negligence exists because this is not their specialty.

5. Medical Errors and Negligence

A negative outcome after medical treatment does not necessarily amount to negligence. This is because the appropriate standards of care can be applied to a patient and they could still experience a negative outcome. That is, their illness could get worse even after proper treatment has been administered.

6. Discovery

A common term in medical malpractice cases, discovery is used to refer to the process of pre-trial investigations where both parties are allowed to ask each other questions and build up a case in the event that they go to trial.

Whether you want to sue or you are being sued for medical malpractice, it is always important to understand the terms associated with medical malpractice law.

4 Types of Medical Malpractice Expert Witnesses that May help Your Claim

If you are involved in a medical malpractice lawsuit, chances are you may need the help of a medical malpractice expert witness. While your attorney can help you decide which type of witness is needed, keep in mind there are several categories to choose from.

1. Nursing experts testify about nursing care.

Medical claims that question the quality or effectiveness of nursing care a patient received may need to hire a nurse expert to review nursing notes to determine whether the standard of care was met. Omissions and errors may also be identified, along with the patient’s condition, treatment, and progress. Ideally, a nurse expert should have legal experience in evaluating medical records and providing testimony in court proceedings.

2. Pharmaceutical experts provide testimony on medications.

A medical lawsuit that includes patient problems with prescriptions and medication may benefit from the services of a pharmaceutical expert witness. This may be a pharmacist with or without legal experience who can assess a patient’s treatment with certain prescriptions or medications that impacted his or her health, safety, or well-being. The witness may be able to offer a professional opinion on whether the right medication, industry-recommended dose, and appropriate safeguards were followed.

3. Physician experts evaluate medical reports.

Medical doctors frequently give testimony about the type and quality of care given a patient. Usually the doctor practices medicine in the same field as that in question, although the expert witness may reside in another county or state. Physician witness statements are sometimes made live for depositions and courtroom testimony. In some cases, however, the doctor may video-record a statement or participate in legal proceedings with the help of videoconferencing technology.

4. Diagnostic testing experts offer insight to electronic tests.

Technicians who operate testing equipment that generates ultrasound or MRI images for diagnostic purposes might be asked to testify about a procedure. A specific machine’s capabilities or limitations may be in question, and the expert can help to confirm whether reports accurately indicate that the machine and its findings were reliable. Operator credentials may also be evaluated if there is a question about testing techniques.

Finding a reliable medical expert witness may make the difference between success and failure in a medical claim. A skilled medical malpractice attorney can access databases with suitable experts who can be considered for litigation support. Although there is a fee for this service, the cost may be well worth it.

6 Important Features of a Medical Malpractice Expert Witness

Every malpractice case needs to be handled with the utmost care. This means calling a medical malpractice expert witness to the stand in many instances. There are several features for a witness to have, which means taking the time to review who they are and what they are capable of providing.

1. Education

Many clients prefer a witness who has attended and graduated from one of the top universities in the country. Depending on the type of medicine studied, it could be John Hopkins University, Harvard Medical School, Duke University, or a number of other top schools.

2. Training

The training is also important when selecting a witness. Their training should be in the specific area that is being called into question. For example, if a witness has gone through training for providing chemotherapy or a specific type of surgery, then it should help to validate that person as a key witness.

3. Familiar with Medical-Legal Process

Having medical experience is not always enough. When a witness has experience with the medical-legal process, such as written and oral testimony experience, causation, and more, it helps to improve their ability to perform in the courtroom.

4. Demeanor

The overall demeanor of a witness should be taken into consideration. A person needs to present themselves as a professional at all times. They also need to be able to go into detail about procedures and stay on topic when they are being questioned about certain things. If they become too flustered, it can impact the case.

5. Communication Skills

A witness must be able to break down complex medical terms and procedures into layman’s speech. If a witness is unable to communicate effectively in the courtroom, it can lead to more confusion than prior to them taking the stand. They need to be clear and well-spoken about the specific topic at hand.

6. Experience

A witness should have experience in the medical field as well as being a witness on previous cases. It’s also helpful if the witness has specific experience performing the procedures or providing the treatments that are in question during the specific case.

By working with a medical malpractice expert witness who excels in these areas, you’re more likely to have a stronger case. Who goes in front of the courtroom on your behalf must be chosen carefully. This is true for both medical malpractice lawyers and the clients that are being represented.

10 Things You Need To WIN A Medical Malpractice Lawsuit (Extended Guide)

One of the hardest types of lawsuits to win is medical malpractice. The New England Journal of Medicine reported that only 21% of the cases filed turn out to be in the plaintiff’s favour. Unfortunately, sub-standard care by physicians is still a wide-spread phenomenon and, as such, if you have been a victim of such practice, you are entitled to seek reparations. Following are the 10 things you should know in order to win your lawsuit.

1. Proof of a Doctor-Patient Relationship

Before you can file any case, you must prove that the defendant was actually your doctor or healthcare provider. This is usually the easiest to prove since multiple records exist of transactions between a patient and their doctor. In the eyes of the law, the doctor can now be held liable for your well-being and any negligence on their part has a bearing. This part of the case is usually unchallenged.

2. Proof of Doctor’s Negligent Care

Usually there exist a standard level of care that a medical practitioner is supposed to provide a patient. The issue lies in proving that the doctor, willfully or not, failed to provide a minimum level of skill and care that should have been given by any professional in his field. This standard, is however arbitrary, and must be established in court by comparing with others in the field. Clinical practice guidelines may also be presented as evidence to establish a baseline. In such cases usually both parties supply expert witnesses who corroborate either the defendant or the plaintiff’s claim. In case of the plaintiff, it is the job of the expert to methodically show how the doctor failed to meet the minimum of needs of the patient as they are required by law and ethics.

3. Establish Link Between Negligence and Injury

It is not enough to prove that the doctor had been negligent in his care. There must also be evidence to show that the negligence has led to the injury which the plaintiff is filing for, and that it could have been prevented with proper attention. Here, the defendant may try to attribute your condition to an underlying condition, or to a failure on your part. Once again, the testimony of an expert witness helps to prove that the injury and resulting damages may occur only as a result of the sub-standard care provided by your physician.

4. Secure an Expert Witness

Cases where you need to prove negligence on part of the hospital or a doctor, the victim must produce an expert witness who can testify that the medical practitioner was indeed negligent and the victim is not crying wolf. The witness must be professionally licensed, trained and must be an expert in the area of care that relates to the case. They must be certified by a governing authority such that the training and expertise is acknowledged. Only then can the medical malpractice expert witness be allowed to testify in court.

5. Know the Statute of Limitations

Most cases have a time limit, called the statute of limitations that specifies the maximum duration for which a claim can be filed. The law on this varies from incident to incident and country to country and it is important to be apprised of all the technical legalities in order to have the strongest case. The rule also depends on the type of patient being injured. For example, in case of injury to a newborn, the family may sue the hospital up to one year after the child’s 18th birthday. On the other hand, negligent death cases allow a window of only a year after the incident. That standard deadline for Alaska is two years.

6. Discovery Rule

In some cases, the patient may not have been able to realize that they had been a victim of medical malpractice and, as such, could not have known that they had a right to sue. In such cases the standard deadline does not start from the date of incident. Instead, the claimant has two years (in case of Alaska) from the date when they knew to file a petition. It must be remembered that the victim has to conclusively prove that they could not have known about the negligent practices before then.

7. Limits of Damages

Depending on the type of injury, some states have limits on the amount that can awarded to the petitioner for damages. It is important to consult an attorney, or in case you self-represent, to know how much to seek so that you do not end up incurring losses. In Alaska, all non-economic (i.e., hindrance to enjoyment/quality of life) damages are capped at $400,000 or life expectancy of the victim multiplied by $8,000.

8. Shared Faults

In some cases the court may find the victim sharing part of the fault with the defendant. Instances from refusing to follow medical orders to knowingly engage in practices that might hinder recovery can all fall under the banner of shared fault. In these cases, the court is liable to reduce the amount of damages awarded to the claimant in proportion to the fault. In situations where the defendant is sure to be declared guilty, their attorney may try to pin part of the blame on you in order to mitigate some of the damage. It is imperative to keep complete records of all activities to avoid any repercussions.

9. Collateral Source Rules

A number of states have rules in place that prevent the plaintiff from claiming payments made by a third party in the case. Ideally, any and all expenses relating to your recovery should be covered under damages if you win. However, in states like California, this is not allowed. Thus you need to carefully weigh the potential costs of the lawsuit and the maximum amount you may receive before going forward with the case.

10. Be Aware of Your Financial Constraints

Trials are expensive with some cases costing upwards of $1 million. A number of cases are lost because the plaintiff simply does not have the ability to keep paying their attorney. Before deciding to file for a case, you must have a clear idea of your budget, what tier of attorney you can afford and how invested you are. Some law firms allow the claimant to pay only on a successful win and thus, may be able to alleviate some of the burden. Research your lawyers carefully before making a final decision.

Qualities of a Good Medical Malpractice Expert Witness

Expert witnesses are very vital for pursuing a medical malpractice case. If you are trying to prove that the medical provider fell below the set standards of the medical practice, then you need an expert witness to testify as to what the proper standards of medical care are. Moreover, the medical malpractice expert witness has to testify how failure to meet the required procedures or standards resulted in the injury or harm that you’re suing for. You can also choose to have another medical malpractice expert witness to testify what the exact injury is.

Most experienced medical malpractice lawyers have the experience of choosing the right medical malpractice expert witnesses for various cases depending on the type of injury. The medical expert witness will evaluate the case and discuss with the lawyer on how to proceed. You can simply let your lawyer go about the process of choosing the best experts that he or she is comfortable working with. In addition, the lawyer knows whether the case deserves a local medical malpractice expert or one from a different state.

Hiring the right medical expert witness will prove to the defense that you’re determined to go an extra mile in seeking justice. It can also be counterproductive if you hire the wrong medical expert witness because that shows that the lawyer doesn’t believe in the validity of the suit or the case is too weak to attract a qualified expert.

Qualities of a good medical malpractice expert witness

Respected medical expert witnesses have the following characteristics and qualifications:

• Should be a medical provider who is active in the medical practice other than just testifying in medical malpractice cases.
• Should have a medical license that is active even if he or she has retired.
• Should not be spending most of his or her practice lifetime in testifying for the defense or various plaintiffs in different courts.
• Should not be an expert who occasionally lectures about how to win or defend medical malpractice cases.
• Should not have published texts or blog posted about the subject of medical malpractice and how he or she has won cases in the process.

Therefore, it’s very important to choose a law firm that has experienced and skilled medical malpractice lawyers who know how to select the best expert witness for your particular case. In case your case is different, an established firm can think outside the box and start a search for medical expert witnesses by contacting sources in national witness organizations.

5 Ways on How To Drastically Reduce The Risk of Medical Malpractice?

As a doctor, the dread of a medical malpractice claim will always be there for you to counter. Be that as it may, knowing you are doing everything you can, to keep such a dreaded disaster from happening can help set your psyche calm. Giving amazing clinical care can, obviously, diminish the probability of a mistake that prompts a claim, however the clinical side is not by any means the only region to concentrate on. Medical malpractice experts give away many tips to avoid such unnecessary unpleasantness.


Extraordinary correspondence among doctors and patients can decrease misbehavior hazards from numerous points of view. When you have a very professional relation with patients, always expect that they will probably research the greater part of their prescribed medicinal lists. Obviously, that lessens the danger of an indicative blunder or slip that could prompt a claim.



Similarly as doctors’ connections with patients are crucial, so are staff individuals’ collaborations with them, taking note of the fact that poor client relations prompts poor patient fulfillment, which improves the probability of a claim which is highly undesirable.



Staff individuals should be discerning that their discussions with other staff, for example, discourses about children, TV shows, et cetera, might be caught by patients. This is highly stressed by Medical malpractice experts.



Furious or irritated patients may dole out their dissatisfaction on staff, so they assume a major part in whether these circumstances are taken care of suitably. One ought to likewise focus on holding instructional meetings in which staff and doctors pretend troublesome patient experiences so that everybody is well settled and trained in the ways of dealing with these circumstances.



Front-work area staff ought to watch persistent responses and feelings as they are leaving your practice. In the event that patients leave annoy, staff ought to advise the doctors or potentially chiefs, who can then call the patient later to check in. That registration call, could be the distinction between a harmed persistent relationship, and a more positive one.

If you follow these simple guidelines, you are sure to never fall on the wrong side and commit the crime of


4 Tips for Finding Qualified Medical Malpractice Experts

Victims of medical malpractice often pursue legal claims against health care providers for compensation with respect to their losses. When a legal case is opened against a medical facility or provider, evidence will need to be organized and presented during discovery to support the victim’s claim. Often, this process will include securing one or more medical malpractice experts who can testify on behalf of the plaintiff to indicate their opinion that the defendant’s negligence caused or contributed to the plaintiff’s losses. Thus, finding a qualified expert is a very important task that may determine the outcome of the case. Finding a medical expert is usually handled by the attorney, but plaintiffs might be able to help by checking with the following sources.

City or county medical associations.

Often, a city or county medical association may exist in the community where the victim resides. While the medical association may not necessarily maintain a database of medical experts for testimony purposes, they may know of and be able to recommend nurse experts or physicians who have provided legal testimony in similar cases. Not every doctor and nurse or other medical professional is willing to review a patient’s records and provide legal testimony during discovery or courtroom proceedings. But those that are sometimes are known and referred to by the local medical association.

Area bar association.

Similarly, the local bar association in a city or region might have a list of local experts that provide this type of legal service. If a formal list is not on file, bar association employees may know of medical experts who have worked on previous cases and be willing to provide a name and contact information. Sometimes they prefer to work directly with the plaintiff’s attorney, and if so, the attorney will request the experts’ information.

Medical service providers.

Hospitals and medical groups usually know of experts within their ranks who work with attorneys as legal experts. They can sometimes recommend the experts to attorneys or victims who are looking for medical expertise in reviewing records and providing legal support to the case.

Medical malpractice victims with similar issues.

Inquiring by word of mouth about others who have been involved in medical situations where experts provided testimony can lead to informal referrals to experts who may be willing to work with an attorney on a specific case in a medical area where the expert has experience.

Attorneys have access to professional databases of medical experts who are willing to review legal claims and provide an informed opinion. The experts should be vetted in terms of credentials, including academic preparation, job history, and legal experience to determine their suitability for a particular legal case.

How To Hire the Best Medical Malpractice Experts

After filing a malpractice lawsuit and while preparing for trial, the plaintiff’s attorney will begin searching for relevant medical malpractice experts. These should not include medical personnel who have treated the plaintiff or who are affiliated with medical practitioners involved with the plaintiff in any way. Often, the malpractice experts are selected from a database containing names with credentials from around the country. Sometimes an attorney has worked with a specific expert in previous cases and will request that person’s participation again. However, when looking for the best malpractice expert for a case, keep the following tips in mind.


Matching an expert to a specific plaintiff injury may be simple if the damages are clearly related to an accident or the presumed negligence of the defendant. For example, if the plaintiff works in a restaurant where proper safety precautions are not taken to protect employees from burn injuries while handling hot food, the restaurant owner and manager may be at fault. However, if the plaintiff’s injuries are potentially due to carelessness on his or her part, or if a burn injury, for example, gets infected possibly due to an underlying health condition like diabetes, an expert with specialization in both areas might be needed. Try to find an expert who has pertinent knowledge on the specific type of injuries or conditions involved.


An expert who lives across the state within driving distance will be cheaper to hire in terms of travel expenses than one who lives across the country. Airplane fare, interstate tolls, lodging, and meals may be added to the expert’s fee. If you have a choice between two equally competent experts, consider hiring the one that resides closer.


A malpractice expert may be highly knowledgeable about his or her field of medical study, but experience is extremely important. Ten years of bedside care or clinical practice providing hands-on experience enhances the academic credentials and research conducted by someone in a particular area of medicine. If possible, it is advisable to hire someone who has given malpractice testimony previously so that he or she will know what to expect and hopefully be prepared to do an expert job.


Medical malpractice experts sometimes provide in their vitas the testimonials of lawyers with whom they have worked. This helps to support their credibility claims and reassure the attorney they are comfortable with and successful in courtroom or deposition testimony and cross examination.

Often, the success of a malpractice claim rests on the testimony of an expert’s testimony. An expert with solid knowledge in the designated medical field may not be able to stand up to defendant’s questioning or challenges. Look for an expert with proven courtroom experience.

Types of Medical Malpractice Claims

Throughout North America, fatalities from medical malpractice are the third most common cause of death. Medical malpractice fatalities fall directly behind heart and cancer death in Canada each year, according to medical malpractice experts.

In addition to the large number of medical malpractice fatalities, many more people suffer injuries arising from healthcare negligence. Medical malpractice claims tend to fall into one or another of different categories

Failure to Properly Diagnose

Many medical malpractice claims in Canada arise from a physician failing to diagnose properly an ailment, disease, or condition afflicting a patient. As a corollary of the failure to properly diagnosis a patient, another are in which malpractice claims are quite common is the failure to diagnose in a timely manner.

Surgical Errors

Surgical errors represent another broad category of medical malpractice claims. Medial malpractice experts maintain that surgical errors come in a variety of different forms. These errors include everything from operating on the wrong part of a patient’s body to leaving a foreign object behind in a patient’s body following a procedure. Other surgical errors include those associated with the administration of anesthesia as well as failure to maintain proper hygiene protocols, resulting in a patient infection.

Failure to Inform Properly

Another area in which medical malpractice claims are based involves a failure to properly inform a patient of the risks of a particular treatment or procedure. In the absence of this type of full disclosure of the benefits and risks of a particular procedure, a patient is not capable of making an informed consent.

Keep in mind that even if a patient is provided a detailed informed consent form to sign, that does not necessarily mean a patient has been properly informed of risks nor consented to them. In fact, because these forms sometimes are provided and signed at inopportune moments, the fact that they were submitted to a patient, who signed the documents, made not prove to be much of a defense to a failure to inform type of claim.

Medication Errors

Mistakes in regard to medications form the basis for a notable number of medical malpractice claims annually. This includes everything from prescribing the wrong medication to indicating improper dosages of a correct medication.

Prenatal and Childbirth Errors

A significant number of medical malpractice cases arise from mistakes made in the case of pregnant patients. In addition a good many claims stem from errors associated with labor and childbirth. These claims can involve the mother, the child, or both.

Engage Legal Medical Experts

When facing a healthcare negligence issue, a patient is wise to be proactive in retaining the services of legal medical experts. A medical malpractice attorney will schedule an initial consultation with a patient to discuss a case, usually with no legal fee charged.